Is Consciousness Physical?

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Is Consciousness Physical? file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Is Consciousness Physical? book. Happy reading Is Consciousness Physical? Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Is Consciousness Physical? at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Is Consciousness Physical? Pocket Guide.

It has the brain's most glorious neurons, called Purkinje cells, which possess tendrils that spread like a sea fan coral and harbor complex electrical dynamics.

Login using

It also has by far the most neurons, about 69 billion most of which are the star-shaped cerebellar granule cells , four times more than in the rest of the brain combined. What happens to consciousness if parts of the cerebellum are lost to a stroke or to the surgeon's knife? Very little! Cerebellar patients complain of several deficits, such as the loss of fluidity of piano playing or keyboard typing but never of losing any aspect of their consciousness.

They hear, see and feel fine, retain a sense of self, recall past events and continue to project themselves into the future. Even being born without a cerebellum does not appreciably affect the conscious experience of the individual. All of the vast cerebellar apparatus is irrelevant to subjective experience. Important hints can be found within its circuitry, which is exceedingly uniform and parallel just as batteries may be connected in parallel.

The cerebellum is almost exclusively a feed-forward circuit: one set of neurons feeds the next, which in turn influences a third set. There are no complex feedback loops that reverberate with electrical activity passing back and forth. Given the time needed for a conscious perception to develop, most theoreticians infer that it must involve feedback loops within the brain's cavernous circuitry.

Moreover, the cerebellum is functionally divided into hundreds or more independent computational modules. Each one operates in parallel, with distinct, nonoverlapping inputs and output, controlling movements of different motor or cognitive systems. They scarcely interact—another feature held indispensable for consciousness. One important lesson from the spinal cord and the cerebellum is that the genie of consciousness does not just appear when any neural tissue is excited.

More is needed. This additional factor is found in the gray matter making up the celebrated cerebral cortex, the outer surface of the brain. It is a laminated sheet of intricately interconnected nervous tissue, the size and width of a inch pizza. Two of these sheets, highly folded, along with their hundreds of millions of wires—the white matter—are crammed into the skull.

All available evidence implicates neocortical tissue in generating feelings. We can narrow down the seat of consciousness even further. Take, for example, experiments in which different stimuli are presented to the right and the left eyes.

  • Sweet Alice?
  • THE FATHER, A son, A daughter, A Love Affair?
  • Works of David Whitmer?

Suppose a picture of Donald Trump is visible only to your left eye and one of Hillary Clinton only to your right eye. We might imagine that you would see some weird superposition of Trump and Clinton. In reality, you will see Trump for a few seconds, after which he will disappear and Clinton will appear, after which she will go away and Trump will reappear.

The two images will alternate in a never-ending dance because of what neuroscientists call binocular rivalry. Because your brain is getting an ambiguous input, it cannot decide: Is it Trump, or is it Clinton? If, at the same time, you are lying inside a magnetic scanner that registers brain activity, experimenters will find that a broad set of cortical regions, collectively known as the posterior hot zone, is active.

These are the parietal, occipital and temporal regions in the posterior part of cortex [ see graphic below ] that play the most significant role in tracking what we see. Curiously, the primary visual cortex that receives and passes on the information streaming up from the eyes does not signal what the subject sees.

  • Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations: Humanizing Business (Routledge Research in Human Rights Law).
  • Could Consciousness Be Physical? The Brain Maintained - Oxford Scholarship;

A similar hierarchy of labor appears to be true of sound and touch: primary auditory and primary somatosensory cortices do not directly contribute to the content of auditory or somatosensory experience. Instead it is the next stages of processing—in the posterior hot zone—that give rise to conscious perception, including the image of Trump or Clinton. More illuminating are two clinical sources of causal evidence: electrical stimulation of cortical tissue and the study of patients following the loss of specific regions caused by injury or disease.

Before removing a brain tumor or the locus of a patient's epileptic seizures, for example, neurosurgeons map the functions of nearby cortical tissue by directly stimulating it with electrodes. Stimulating the posterior hot zone can trigger a diversity of distinct sensations and feelings. These could be flashes of light, geometric shapes, distortions of faces, auditory or visual hallucinations, a feeling of familiarity or unreality, the urge to move a specific limb, and so on.

Stimulating the front of the cortex is a different matter: by and large, it elicits no direct experience.

  1. The Hard Problem of Consciousness?
  2. The Physics arXiv Blog?
  3. Site Index.
  4. The Thirty Year Rule: Historical Secrets Can Only Remain Buried For 30 Years.
  5. How Can Consciousness Be a Material Thing? | Mind Matters.
  6. A second source of insights are neurological patients from the first half of the 20th century. Surgeons sometimes had to excise a large belt of prefrontal cortex to remove tumors or to ameliorate epileptic seizures. What is remarkable is how unremarkable these patients appeared. The loss of a portion of the frontal lobe did have certain deleterious effects: the patients developed a lack of inhibition of inappropriate emotions or actions, motor deficits, or uncontrollable repetition of specific action or words.

    Following the operation, however, their personality and IQ improved, and they went on to live for many more years, with no evidence that the drastic removal of frontal tissue significantly affected their conscious experience. Conversely, removal of even small regions of the posterior cortex, where the hot zone resides, can lead to a loss of entire classes of conscious content: patients are unable to recognize faces or to see motion, color or space. So it appears that the sights, sounds and other sensations of life as we experience it are generated by regions within the posterior cortex.

    Is Consciousness in the Physical World? We May Be About to Find Out. - Big Think

    As far as we can tell, almost all conscious experiences have their origin there. What is the crucial difference between these posterior regions and much of the prefrontal cortex, which does not directly contribute to subjective content? The truth is that we do not know. Even so—and excitingly—a recent finding indicates that neuroscientists may be getting closer. An unmet clinical need exists for a device that reliably detects the presence or absence of consciousness in impaired or incapacitated individuals.

    During surgery, for example, patients are anesthetized to keep them immobile and their blood pressure stable and to eliminate pain and traumatic memories. Unfortunately, this goal is not always met: every year hundreds of patients have some awareness under anesthesia.

    More on this subject

    Another category of patients, who have severe brain injury because of accidents, infections or extreme intoxication, may live for years without being able to speak or respond to verbal requests. Establishing that they experience life is a grave challenge to the clinical arts. Think of an astronaut adrift in space, listening to mission control's attempts to contact him. His damaged radio does not relay his voice, and he appears lost to the world.

    This is the forlorn situation of patients whose damaged brain will not let them communicate to the world—an extreme form of solitary confinement. In the early s Giulio Tononi of the University of Wisconsin—Madison and Marcello Massimini, now at the University of Milan in Italy, pioneered a technique, called zap and zip, to probe whether someone is conscious or not. The perturbation, in turn, excited and inhibited the neurons' partner cells in connected regions, in a chain reverberating across the cortex, until the activity died out.

    A network of electroencephalogram EEG sensors, positioned outside the skull, recorded these electrical signals. As they unfolded over time, these traces, each corresponding to a specific location in the brain below the skull, yielded a movie. These unfolding records neither sketched a stereotypical pattern, nor were they completely random.

    More on this subject

    Remarkably, the more predictable these waxing and waning rhythms were, the more likely the brain was unconscious. The zipping yielded an estimate of the complexity of the brain's response. Massimini and Tononi tested this zap-and-zip measure on 48 patients who were brain-injured but responsive and awake, finding that in every case, the method confirmed the behavioral evidence for consciousness.

    What is CONSCIOUSNESS? The Case for the Quantum Soul

    The team then applied zap and zip to 81 patients who were minimally conscious or in a vegetative state. For the former group, which showed some signs of nonreflexive behavior, the method correctly found 36 out of 38 patients to be conscious. It misdiagnosed two patients as unconscious. Of the 43 vegetative-state patients in which all bedside attempts to establish communication failed, 34 were labeled as unconscious, but nine were not.

    Their brains responded similarly to those of conscious controls—implying that they were conscious yet unable to communicate with their loved ones. Ongoing studies seek to standardize and improve zap and zip for neurological patients and to extend it to psychiatric and pediatric patients. Sooner or later scientists will discover the specific set of neural mechanisms that give rise to any one experience. Although these findings will have important clinical implications and may give succor to families and friends, they will not answer some fundamental questions: Why these neurons and not those?

    Why this particular frequency and not that? Indeed, the abiding mystery is how and why any highly organized piece of active matter gives rise to conscious sensation. After all, the brain is like any other organ, subject to the same physical laws as the heart or the liver. Home Topics Cosmos. Overview TV Program Contact. Search Closer to Truth. Via Social.